Tag Archives: jain

Mobility Patterns in Shared, Autonomous, and Connected Urban Transport

N. Ronald, Z. Navidi, Y. Wang, M. Rigby, S. Jain, R. Kutadinata, R. Thompson, and S. Winter, “Mobility patterns in shared, autonomous, and connected urban transport,” in Disrupting Mobility: Impacts of sharing economy and innovative transportation on cities, ser. Lecture Notes in Mobility, G. Meyer and S. Shaheen, Eds. Springer, 2017.

Abstract:

A number of recent technological breakthroughs promise disrupting urban mobility as we know it. But anticipating such disruption requires valid predictions: disruption implies that predictions cannot simply be extrapolations from a current state. Predictions have to consider the social, economic and spatial context of mobility. This paper studies mechanisms to support evidence-based transport planning in disrupting times. It presents various approaches, mostly based on simulation, to estimate the potential or real impact of the introduction of new paradigms on urban mobility, such as ad-hoc shared forms of transportation, au-tonomously driving electrical vehicles, or IT platforms coordinating and integrating modes of transportation.

Predicting susceptibility to use demand responsive transport using demographic and trip characteristics of the population

S. Jain, N. Ronald, R. Thompson, and S. Winter, “Predicting susceptibility to use demand responsive transport using demographic and trip characteristics of the population”, Travel Behaviour and Society, 6:44-56, 2017

Abstract:

Shared transportation providing point-to-point services on demand, although not an unknown element in urban mobility, has started gaining more presence with the growth of information technology in the transport sector. These forms of transport modes will supplement or compete with the existing public and private transport. Their mixed reception in the past is a matter of concern especially before making investment decisions. To find feasible opportunities of implementation, an estimation of the demand patterns in the target city is desirable. This paper will provide and evaluate a methodology for this estimation that avoids ambivalent and expensive user preference surveys. Demand patterns are caused by the spatial variation of demographic characteristics, and travel behavior over the city. Usability patterns of the proposed services can be learned from the experience of similar services operating elsewhere. Variations of the identified favorable characteristics can be found out in the target city using travel surveys of a population sample. The resulting spatial patterns can be used to find the more favorable areas for implementation of such transport modes. The methodology can be validated by applying it on the existing transport modes in the target city, which will also help in understanding the nature of competition among the proposed and existing transport modes. As the review of operating services is generic, it can be used in conjunction with respective travel surveys in different places. Similarly, a review can be done for any proposed transport mode and provided methodology can be applied for exploring demand patterns.

Best poster at Disrupting Mobility

dm-posters

All 5 posters from our group presented at the summit, while the editor was assessing for the award.

We (Kutadinata, Das, Duffield, Jain, Kotagiri, Kulik, Navidikashani, Rigby, Ronald, Thompson, Wang and Winter, with Kelly and Wallace (Monash University)) have won the Best Poster Award at last week’s Disrupting Mobility, a Global Summit Investigating Sustainable Futures held in Cambridge, MA. Our awarded poster, Shared, Autonomous, Connected and Electric Urban Transport, showed results of various aspects of the ongoing ARC Linkage Project Integrating Mobility on Demand in Urban Transport Infrastructures.

Click on the following list to view the presented posters (as PDF files):

  1. R. Kutadinata, R. D. Das, C. Duffield, S. Jain, R. Kelly, R. Kotagiri, L. Kulik, Z. Navidikashani, M. Rigby, N. Ronald, R. Thompson, M. Wallace, Y. Wang, S. Winter, “Shared, autonomous, connected and electric urban transport.” – the big picture of the Linkage Project
  2. N. Ronald, R. Thompson, R. Kutadinata, S. Winter, “Optimizing shared on-demand passenger and goods mobility.”
  3. Z. Navidikashani, S. Winter, N. Ronald, R. Kutadinata, “Disruptive effects of demand responsive transport systems on mobility.”
  4. Y. Wang, N. Ronald, R. Kutadinata, S. Winter, “How much is trust: The cost and benefit of ridesharing with friends.”
  5. S. Jain, N. Ronald, R. Thompson, R. Kutadinata, S. Winter, “Exploring susceptibility of shared mobility in urban space.”

Disrupting Mobility Summit

The group submitted five abstracts for poster presentations in the Disrupting Mobility Summit: A global summit investigating sustainable futures to be held in November, Cambridge MA. All five were accepted. This summit is an interactive forum for leading executives, government representatives, and academics to discuss sustainable futures of transportation. It will bring together around 350 mobility experts from different continents. The program will tackle current trends in mobility by attracting thought leaders from companies, governments and academia. More details about the summit can be found here.

Here is the list of the posters we will present at the summit:

  1. R. Kutadinata, R. D. Das, C. Duffield, S. Jain, R. Kotagiri, L. Kulik, Z. Navidikashani, M. Rigby, N. Ronald, R. Thompson, M. Wallace, Y. Wang, S. Winter, “Shared, autonomous, connected and electric urban transport.” – the big picture of the Linkage Project
  2. Ronald, R. Thompson, R. Kutadinata, S. Winter, “Optimizing shared on-demand passenger and goods mobility.”
  3. Navidikashani, S. Winter, N. Ronald, R. Kutadinata, “Disruptive effects of demand responsive transport systems on mobility.”
  4. Wang, N. Ronald, R. Kutadinata, S. Winter, “How much is trust: The cost and benefit of ridesharing with friends.”
  5. S. Jain, N. Ronald, R. Thompson, R. Kutadinata, S. Winter, “Exploring susceptibility of shared mobility in urban space.”

Creating a synthetic population: A comparison of tools

S. Jain, N. Ronald, S. Winter, “Creating a synthetic population: A comparison of tools”, in Proceedings of 3rd Conference of Transportation Research Group, Dec. 2015

Shubham Jain will present his work titled “Creating a synthetic population: A comparison of tools” in Conference of Transportation Research Group in Kolkata, India. In his MPhil research, he plans to use population characteristics and current activity-travel pattern of Melbourne from population census data and existing, self-completed household travel survey (VISTA) in conjunction with insights from usage pattern of some of the existing collaborative transport services in different regions of the world to identify demand of these services here. This kind of demand modelling requires microdata of population at household and personal level as a key input. Unfortunately due to privacy constraints, such data is often not available. To fulfill this lack of data, population can be synthesised to represent actual demographics of study area as per population census. This paper presents the process of creating a synthetic population for a metropolis for the case of Greater Melbourne using 2011 Population Census. Microdata was created for households and persons in Greater Melbourne at statistical area level 1 (SA1). PopSynWin (developed by University of Illinois at Chicago in 2008), which is based on Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) algorithm, and PopGen (Population Generator, developed by Arizona State University in 2009), which is based on Iterative Proportional Update (IPU) algorithm, were used as tools for this purpose, generating two different synthetic populations. Microdata within these synthetic populations were aggregated to validate against actual aggregate census data to evaluate its representativeness to original population. Finally, both the generated populations were compared in various ways to use the more accurate of them for further work.

CAITR 2015: hosting and more DRT

Shubham Jain will be attending CAITR (Conference of Australian Institutes of Transport Research) on 12-13 February, hosted by the Melbourne School of Engineering. He will be presenting work-in-progress on his MPhil thesis, focusing on the simulation of demand for demand-responsive transportation.

Mobility and accessibility is a problem for growing cities. To meet this challenge in a sustainable way, taking congestion, fuel consumption, and environmental impacts into consideration, new forms of transport need to be considered. One possible solution is Demand Responsive Transport System (DRTS) which provides flexible point-to-point service on casual requests. It operates at flexible routes and does not have pre-defined schedules. Before deploying a DRTS, we need to simulate the facility and we require to predict travel demand for it. Activity-based micro-simulation models for travel demand explicitly recognise that individuals and households are the actual decision makers, and that travel demand is derived from travellers’ desire to participate in spatially dispersed activities. This research attempts to predict travel demand for DRTS using activity based modeling. This paper presents early research and findings on generating synthetic population of city of Melbourne using PopGen and PopSynWin software and their comparison. Further research would assign travel diaries to synthetic population using Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity (VISTA) data and predict mode shift to DRTS.

Joann Yang, a research assistant in Infrastructure Engineering at the University of Melbourne, will also present a literature review on on-demand freight transportation. This is part of another paper in preparation for the upcoming City Logistics conference, which uses the demand-responsive transport simulations developed as part of the iMoD project to explore on-demand, shared passenger/goods travel.

Note that both Russell Thompson and Nicole Ronald are involved in organising CAITR, so will be present as well. We are looking forward to welcoming all the participating students, researchers, and practitioners from around Australia!

GIES Research Conference 2014

IMG_1690Our current iMoD research students are members of the Graduate Infrastructure Engineering Society (GIES) at the University of Melbourne. Each year GIES organises a conference at which the majority of the 130 research students in the department present their work and produce a poster (students who started recently are exempt). Academic staff members, including Stephan Winter and Nicole Ronald, chair sessions and provide feedback to students.

iMoD presented four presentations during the day: Michael Rigby, Rahul Deb Das and Haifeng Zhao presented in 10 minute slots, while Shubham Jain, as a new student, gave a three minute overview of his planned research. On the day, he was awarded a best presentation prize, based on ratings from both academic staff and research students. Prior to the event, Shubham Jain participated in the Second Slide competition.

We look forward to returning next year with more presentations!

Click for Michael's full poster.

Click for Michael’s full poster.

Click for Rahul's full poster.

Click for Rahul’s full poster.